>Thrikkakara MLA Uma Thomas has urged the Chief Minister to determine whether Vinayakan’s actions were right or wrong, emphasizing the need to distinguish between real-life conduct and movie roles. She debunked the misconception that causing a commotion at a police station would lead to station bail, asserting that there’s no necessity to question officers’ identities when they are in a police vehicle. Uma Thomas also underlined that, despite not being a celebrity, Vinayakan serves as a role model for many.
The MLA had previously posted a critical Facebook message concerning Vinayakan’s bail. Uma Thomas questioned whether Vinayakan’s political affiliation played a role in the decision, arguing that the incident warranted prosecution under non-bailable charges. She raised suspicions about potential instructions from Cliff House regarding Vinayakan’s bail approval.Uma Thomas reiterated that the incident merited a case under non-bailable sections, highlighting the influence of political connections on police interventions. She further commented on the hasty granting of bail to Vinayakan, which occurred even before the results of a drug test were available.
